summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/samples
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>2015-07-14 15:39:50 (GMT)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2015-08-03 10:21:23 (GMT)
commit63b0e9edceec10fa41ec33393a1515a5ff444277 (patch)
treed895837f47d954fc91e98862d853dfd810e56feb /samples
parentfbd705a0c6184580d0e2fbcbd47a37b6e5822511 (diff)
downloadlinux-63b0e9edceec10fa41ec33393a1515a5ff444277.tar.xz
sched/fair: Beef up wake_wide()
Josef Bacik reported that Facebook sees better performance with their 1:N load (1 dispatch/node, N workers/node) when carrying an old patch to try very hard to wake to an idle CPU. While looking at wake_wide(), I noticed that it doesn't pay attention to the wakeup of a many partner waker, returning 1 only when waking one of its many partners. Correct that, letting explicit domain flags override the heuristic. While at it, adjust task_struct bits, we don't need a 64-bit counter. Tested-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> [ Tidy things up. ] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: kernel-team<Kernel-team@fb.com> Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1436888390.7983.49.camel@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'samples')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions