diff options
| author | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> | 2014-04-22 05:12:05 (GMT) |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2014-04-30 23:15:32 (GMT) |
| commit | dec102aa9ac112d66133314815d20233c96ad749 (patch) | |
| tree | 4cea53753fff42a1afa668e88ed070d5e68c8976 /tools/power/cpupower | |
| parent | e5eaa445b0dc90d99eab6239841a982e5df2682f (diff) | |
| download | linux-dec102aa9ac112d66133314815d20233c96ad749.tar.xz | |
cpufreq: Make linux-pm@vger.kernel.org official mailing list
There has been confusion all the time about which mailing list to follow
for cpufreq activities, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org or cpufreq@vger.kernel.org.
Since patches sent to cpufreq@vger.kernel.org don't go to Patchwork
which is a maintenance workflow problem, make linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
the official mailing list for cpufreq stuff and remove all references
of cpufreq@vger.kernel.org from kernel source.
Later, we can request that the list be dropped entirely.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/power/cpupower')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/power/cpupower/Makefile | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/power/cpupower/debug/kernel/cpufreq-test_tsc.c | 2 |
2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/Makefile b/tools/power/cpupower/Makefile index cbfec92..3651db7 100644 --- a/tools/power/cpupower/Makefile +++ b/tools/power/cpupower/Makefile @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ LIB_MAJ= 0.0.0 LIB_MIN= 0 PACKAGE = cpupower -PACKAGE_BUGREPORT = cpufreq@vger.kernel.org +PACKAGE_BUGREPORT = linux-pm@vger.kernel.org LANGUAGES = de fr it cs pt diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/debug/kernel/cpufreq-test_tsc.c b/tools/power/cpupower/debug/kernel/cpufreq-test_tsc.c index 0f10b81..5224ee5 100644 --- a/tools/power/cpupower/debug/kernel/cpufreq-test_tsc.c +++ b/tools/power/cpupower/debug/kernel/cpufreq-test_tsc.c @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ * 5.) if the third value, "diff_pmtmr", changes between 2. and 4., the * TSC-based delay routine on the Linux kernel does not correctly * handle the cpufreq transition. Please report this to - * cpufreq@vger.kernel.org + * linux-pm@vger.kernel.org */ #include <linux/kernel.h> |