diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | net/ipv4/icmp.c | 84 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 82 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv4/icmp.c b/net/ipv4/icmp.c index ea3a996..f2a06be 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/icmp.c +++ b/net/ipv4/icmp.c @@ -837,86 +837,6 @@ out_err: goto out; } - -/* - * Handle ICMP_ADDRESS_MASK requests. (RFC950) - * - * RFC1122 (3.2.2.9). A host MUST only send replies to - * ADDRESS_MASK requests if it's been configured as an address mask - * agent. Receiving a request doesn't constitute implicit permission to - * act as one. Of course, implementing this correctly requires (SHOULD) - * a way to turn the functionality on and off. Another one for sysctl(), - * I guess. -- MS - * - * RFC1812 (4.3.3.9). A router MUST implement it. - * A router SHOULD have switch turning it on/off. - * This switch MUST be ON by default. - * - * Gratuitous replies, zero-source replies are not implemented, - * that complies with RFC. DO NOT implement them!!! All the idea - * of broadcast addrmask replies as specified in RFC950 is broken. - * The problem is that it is not uncommon to have several prefixes - * on one physical interface. Moreover, addrmask agent can even be - * not aware of existing another prefixes. - * If source is zero, addrmask agent cannot choose correct prefix. - * Gratuitous mask announcements suffer from the same problem. - * RFC1812 explains it, but still allows to use ADDRMASK, - * that is pretty silly. --ANK - * - * All these rules are so bizarre, that I removed kernel addrmask - * support at all. It is wrong, it is obsolete, nobody uses it in - * any case. --ANK - * - * Furthermore you can do it with a usermode address agent program - * anyway... - */ - -static void icmp_address(struct sk_buff *skb) -{ -#if 0 - net_dbg_ratelimited("a guy asks for address mask. Who is it?\n"); -#endif -} - -/* - * RFC1812 (4.3.3.9). A router SHOULD listen all replies, and complain - * loudly if an inconsistency is found. - * called with rcu_read_lock() - */ - -static void icmp_address_reply(struct sk_buff *skb) -{ - struct rtable *rt = skb_rtable(skb); - struct net_device *dev = skb->dev; - struct in_device *in_dev; - struct in_ifaddr *ifa; - - if (skb->len < 4 || !(rt->rt_flags&RTCF_DIRECTSRC)) - return; - - in_dev = __in_dev_get_rcu(dev); - if (!in_dev) - return; - - if (in_dev->ifa_list && - IN_DEV_LOG_MARTIANS(in_dev) && - IN_DEV_FORWARD(in_dev)) { - __be32 _mask, *mp; - - mp = skb_header_pointer(skb, 0, sizeof(_mask), &_mask); - BUG_ON(mp == NULL); - for (ifa = in_dev->ifa_list; ifa; ifa = ifa->ifa_next) { - if (*mp == ifa->ifa_mask && - inet_ifa_match(ip_hdr(skb)->saddr, ifa)) - break; - } - if (!ifa) - net_info_ratelimited("Wrong address mask %pI4 from %s/%pI4\n", - mp, - dev->name, &ip_hdr(skb)->saddr); - } -} - static void icmp_discard(struct sk_buff *skb) { } @@ -1080,10 +1000,10 @@ static const struct icmp_control icmp_pointers[NR_ICMP_TYPES + 1] = { .handler = icmp_discard, }, [ICMP_ADDRESS] = { - .handler = icmp_address, + .handler = icmp_discard, }, [ICMP_ADDRESSREPLY] = { - .handler = icmp_address_reply, + .handler = icmp_discard, }, }; |