diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched/fair.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/fair.c | 97 |
1 files changed, 63 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index ecd81c4..b70367a 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -4563,7 +4563,6 @@ decay_load_missed(unsigned long load, unsigned long missed_updates, int idx) * @this_rq: The rq to update statistics for * @this_load: The current load * @pending_updates: The number of missed updates - * @active: !0 for NOHZ_FULL * * Update rq->cpu_load[] statistics. This function is usually called every * scheduler tick (TICK_NSEC). @@ -4592,12 +4591,12 @@ decay_load_missed(unsigned long load, unsigned long missed_updates, int idx) * load[i]_n = (1 - 1/2^i)^n * load[i]_0 * * see decay_load_misses(). For NOHZ_FULL we get to subtract and add the extra - * term. See the @active paramter. + * term. */ -static void __cpu_load_update(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long this_load, - unsigned long pending_updates, int active) +static void cpu_load_update(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long this_load, + unsigned long pending_updates) { - unsigned long tickless_load = active ? this_rq->cpu_load[0] : 0; + unsigned long tickless_load = this_rq->cpu_load[0]; int i, scale; this_rq->nr_load_updates++; @@ -4642,10 +4641,23 @@ static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu) } #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON -static void __cpu_load_update_nohz(struct rq *this_rq, - unsigned long curr_jiffies, - unsigned long load, - int active) +/* + * There is no sane way to deal with nohz on smp when using jiffies because the + * cpu doing the jiffies update might drift wrt the cpu doing the jiffy reading + * causing off-by-one errors in observed deltas; {0,2} instead of {1,1}. + * + * Therefore we need to avoid the delta approach from the regular tick when + * possible since that would seriously skew the load calculation. This is why we + * use cpu_load_update_periodic() for CPUs out of nohz. However we'll rely on + * jiffies deltas for updates happening while in nohz mode (idle ticks, idle + * loop exit, nohz_idle_balance, nohz full exit...) + * + * This means we might still be one tick off for nohz periods. + */ + +static void cpu_load_update_nohz(struct rq *this_rq, + unsigned long curr_jiffies, + unsigned long load) { unsigned long pending_updates; @@ -4657,24 +4669,11 @@ static void __cpu_load_update_nohz(struct rq *this_rq, * In the NOHZ_FULL case, we were non-idle, we should consider * its weighted load. */ - __cpu_load_update(this_rq, load, pending_updates, active); + cpu_load_update(this_rq, load, pending_updates); } } /* - * There is no sane way to deal with nohz on smp when using jiffies because the - * cpu doing the jiffies update might drift wrt the cpu doing the jiffy reading - * causing off-by-one errors in observed deltas; {0,2} instead of {1,1}. - * - * Therefore we cannot use the delta approach from the regular tick since that - * would seriously skew the load calculation. However we'll make do for those - * updates happening while idle (nohz_idle_balance) or coming out of idle - * (tick_nohz_idle_exit). - * - * This means we might still be one tick off for nohz periods. - */ - -/* * Called from nohz_idle_balance() to update the load ratings before doing the * idle balance. */ @@ -4686,26 +4685,56 @@ static void cpu_load_update_idle(struct rq *this_rq) if (weighted_cpuload(cpu_of(this_rq))) return; - __cpu_load_update_nohz(this_rq, READ_ONCE(jiffies), 0, 0); + cpu_load_update_nohz(this_rq, READ_ONCE(jiffies), 0); } /* - * Called from tick_nohz_idle_exit() -- try and fix up the ticks we missed. + * Record CPU load on nohz entry so we know the tickless load to account + * on nohz exit. cpu_load[0] happens then to be updated more frequently + * than other cpu_load[idx] but it should be fine as cpu_load readers + * shouldn't rely into synchronized cpu_load[*] updates. */ -void cpu_load_update_nohz(int active) +void cpu_load_update_nohz_start(void) { struct rq *this_rq = this_rq(); + + /* + * This is all lockless but should be fine. If weighted_cpuload changes + * concurrently we'll exit nohz. And cpu_load write can race with + * cpu_load_update_idle() but both updater would be writing the same. + */ + this_rq->cpu_load[0] = weighted_cpuload(cpu_of(this_rq)); +} + +/* + * Account the tickless load in the end of a nohz frame. + */ +void cpu_load_update_nohz_stop(void) +{ unsigned long curr_jiffies = READ_ONCE(jiffies); - unsigned long load = active ? weighted_cpuload(cpu_of(this_rq)) : 0; + struct rq *this_rq = this_rq(); + unsigned long load; if (curr_jiffies == this_rq->last_load_update_tick) return; + load = weighted_cpuload(cpu_of(this_rq)); raw_spin_lock(&this_rq->lock); - __cpu_load_update_nohz(this_rq, curr_jiffies, load, active); + cpu_load_update_nohz(this_rq, curr_jiffies, load); raw_spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock); } -#endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ */ +#else /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */ +static inline void cpu_load_update_nohz(struct rq *this_rq, + unsigned long curr_jiffies, + unsigned long load) { } +#endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */ + +static void cpu_load_update_periodic(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long load) +{ + /* See the mess around cpu_load_update_nohz(). */ + this_rq->last_load_update_tick = READ_ONCE(jiffies); + cpu_load_update(this_rq, load, 1); +} /* * Called from scheduler_tick() @@ -4713,11 +4742,11 @@ void cpu_load_update_nohz(int active) void cpu_load_update_active(struct rq *this_rq) { unsigned long load = weighted_cpuload(cpu_of(this_rq)); - /* - * See the mess around cpu_load_update_idle() / cpu_load_update_nohz(). - */ - this_rq->last_load_update_tick = jiffies; - __cpu_load_update(this_rq, load, 1, 1); + + if (tick_nohz_tick_stopped()) + cpu_load_update_nohz(this_rq, READ_ONCE(jiffies), load); + else + cpu_load_update_periodic(this_rq, load); } /* |