diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/workqueue.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/workqueue.c | 60 |
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 479d840..296dcca 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ enum { * attach_mutex to avoid changing binding state while * worker_attach_to_pool() is in progress. */ + POOL_MANAGER_ACTIVE = 1 << 0, /* being managed */ POOL_DISASSOCIATED = 1 << 2, /* cpu can't serve workers */ /* worker flags */ @@ -165,7 +166,6 @@ struct worker_pool { /* L: hash of busy workers */ /* see manage_workers() for details on the two manager mutexes */ - struct mutex manager_arb; /* manager arbitration */ struct worker *manager; /* L: purely informational */ struct mutex attach_mutex; /* attach/detach exclusion */ struct list_head workers; /* A: attached workers */ @@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ static struct workqueue_attrs *wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf; static DEFINE_MUTEX(wq_pool_mutex); /* protects pools and workqueues list */ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(wq_mayday_lock); /* protects wq->maydays list */ +static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(wq_manager_wait); /* wait for manager to go away */ static LIST_HEAD(workqueues); /* PR: list of all workqueues */ static bool workqueue_freezing; /* PL: have wqs started freezing? */ @@ -799,7 +800,7 @@ static bool need_to_create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool) /* Do we have too many workers and should some go away? */ static bool too_many_workers(struct worker_pool *pool) { - bool managing = mutex_is_locked(&pool->manager_arb); + bool managing = pool->flags & POOL_MANAGER_ACTIVE; int nr_idle = pool->nr_idle + managing; /* manager is considered idle */ int nr_busy = pool->nr_workers - nr_idle; @@ -1979,24 +1980,17 @@ static bool manage_workers(struct worker *worker) { struct worker_pool *pool = worker->pool; - /* - * Anyone who successfully grabs manager_arb wins the arbitration - * and becomes the manager. mutex_trylock() on pool->manager_arb - * failure while holding pool->lock reliably indicates that someone - * else is managing the pool and the worker which failed trylock - * can proceed to executing work items. This means that anyone - * grabbing manager_arb is responsible for actually performing - * manager duties. If manager_arb is grabbed and released without - * actual management, the pool may stall indefinitely. - */ - if (!mutex_trylock(&pool->manager_arb)) + if (pool->flags & POOL_MANAGER_ACTIVE) return false; + + pool->flags |= POOL_MANAGER_ACTIVE; pool->manager = worker; maybe_create_worker(pool); pool->manager = NULL; - mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_arb); + pool->flags &= ~POOL_MANAGER_ACTIVE; + wake_up(&wq_manager_wait); return true; } @@ -3203,7 +3197,6 @@ static int init_worker_pool(struct worker_pool *pool) setup_timer(&pool->mayday_timer, pool_mayday_timeout, (unsigned long)pool); - mutex_init(&pool->manager_arb); mutex_init(&pool->attach_mutex); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->workers); @@ -3273,13 +3266,15 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool) hash_del(&pool->hash_node); /* - * Become the manager and destroy all workers. Grabbing - * manager_arb prevents @pool's workers from blocking on - * attach_mutex. + * Become the manager and destroy all workers. This prevents + * @pool's workers from blocking on attach_mutex. We're the last + * manager and @pool gets freed with the flag set. */ - mutex_lock(&pool->manager_arb); - spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock); + wait_event_lock_irq(wq_manager_wait, + !(pool->flags & POOL_MANAGER_ACTIVE), pool->lock); + pool->flags |= POOL_MANAGER_ACTIVE; + while ((worker = first_idle_worker(pool))) destroy_worker(worker); WARN_ON(pool->nr_workers || pool->nr_idle); @@ -3293,8 +3288,6 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool) if (pool->detach_completion) wait_for_completion(pool->detach_completion); - mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_arb); - /* shut down the timers */ del_timer_sync(&pool->idle_timer); del_timer_sync(&pool->mayday_timer); @@ -3730,8 +3723,12 @@ static int apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(struct workqueue_struct *wq, return -EINVAL; /* creating multiple pwqs breaks ordering guarantee */ - if (WARN_ON((wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED) && !list_empty(&wq->pwqs))) - return -EINVAL; + if (!list_empty(&wq->pwqs)) { + if (WARN_ON(wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT)) + return -EINVAL; + + wq->flags &= ~__WQ_ORDERED; + } ctx = apply_wqattrs_prepare(wq, attrs); if (!ctx) @@ -3915,6 +3912,16 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__alloc_workqueue_key(const char *fmt, struct workqueue_struct *wq; struct pool_workqueue *pwq; + /* + * Unbound && max_active == 1 used to imply ordered, which is no + * longer the case on NUMA machines due to per-node pools. While + * alloc_ordered_workqueue() is the right way to create an ordered + * workqueue, keep the previous behavior to avoid subtle breakages + * on NUMA. + */ + if ((flags & WQ_UNBOUND) && max_active == 1) + flags |= __WQ_ORDERED; + /* see the comment above the definition of WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT */ if ((flags & WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT) && wq_power_efficient) flags |= WQ_UNBOUND; @@ -4103,13 +4110,14 @@ void workqueue_set_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int max_active) struct pool_workqueue *pwq; /* disallow meddling with max_active for ordered workqueues */ - if (WARN_ON(wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED)) + if (WARN_ON(wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT)) return; max_active = wq_clamp_max_active(max_active, wq->flags, wq->name); mutex_lock(&wq->mutex); + wq->flags &= ~__WQ_ORDERED; wq->saved_max_active = max_active; for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) @@ -5214,7 +5222,7 @@ int workqueue_sysfs_register(struct workqueue_struct *wq) * attributes breaks ordering guarantee. Disallow exposing ordered * workqueues. */ - if (WARN_ON(wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED)) + if (WARN_ON(wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT)) return -EINVAL; wq->wq_dev = wq_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*wq_dev), GFP_KERNEL); |