| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
In some ways, the OMAP4 PRCM register layout is quite different than
the OMAP2/3 PRCM register layout. For example, on OMAP2/3, from a
register layout point of view, all CM instances were located in the CM
subsystem, and all PRM instances were located in the PRM subsystem.
OMAP4 changes this. Now, for example, some CM instances, such as
WKUP_CM and EMU_CM, are located in the system PRM subsystem. And a
"local PRCM" exists for the MPU - this PRCM combines registers that
would normally appear in both CM and PRM instances, but uses its own
register layout which matches neither the OMAP2/3 PRCM layout nor the
OMAP4 PRCM layout.
To try to deal with this, introduce some new functions, omap4_cminst*
and omap4_prminst*. The former is to be used when writing to a CM
instance register (no matter what subsystem or hardware module it
exists in), and the latter, similarly, with PRM instance registers.
To determine which "PRCM partition" to write to, the functions take a
PRCM instance ID argument. Subsequent patches add these partition IDs
to the OMAP4 powerdomain and clockdomain definitions.
As far as I can see, there's really no good way to handle these types
of register access inconsistencies. This patch seemed like the least
bad approach.
Moving forward, the long-term goal is to remove all direct PRCM
register access from the PM code. PRCM register access should go
through layers such as the powerdomain and clockdomain code that can
hide the details of how to interact with the specific hardware
variant.
While here, rename cm4xxx.c to cm44xx.c to match the naming convention
of the other OMAP4 PRCM files.
Thanks to Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, Rajendra Nayak
<rnayak@ti.com>, and Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> for some comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
|
|
In preparation for adding OMAP4-specific PRCM accessor/mutator
functions, split the existing OMAP2/3 PRCM code into OMAP2/3-specific
files. Most of what was in mach-omap2/{cm,prm}.{c,h} has now been
moved into mach-omap2/{cm,prm}2xxx_3xxx.{c,h}, since it was
OMAP2xxx/3xxx-specific.
This process also requires the #includes in each of these files to be
changed to reference the new file name. As part of doing so, add some
comments into plat-omap/sram.c and plat-omap/mcbsp.c, which use
"sideways includes", to indicate that these users of the PRM/CM includes
should not be doing so.
Thanks to Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> for comments on this
patch.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Jarkko Nikula <jhnikula@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Cc: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@ti.com>
Acked-by: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@ti.com>
Cc: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Tested-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
|
|
The omap4_cm_wait_module_ready function would only check for
the modules to be completely functional before declaring them
ready to be accessed.
There might also be instances where in the module is actually
in idle (under h/w control) but should still be declared
accessible, as the h/w control would make it functional when
needed.
Hence make omap4_cm_wait_module_ready return true in case
the module is fully functional *or* in idle state.
Fail only if the module is fully disabled or stuck intransition.
The explaination from the TRM for the idlest bits on OMAP4 is as
below for quick reference
Module idle state:
0x0 func: Module is fully functional, including OCP
0x1 trans: Module is performing transition: wakeup, or sleep, or sleep
abortion
0x2 idle: Module is in Idle mode (only OCP part). It is functional if
using separate functional clock
0x3 disabled: Module is disabled and cannot be accessed
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Partha Basak <p-basak2@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
|
|
The return of the omap4_cm_wait_module_ready function is checked
in order to avoid accessing the sysconfig register if the module is
not in the correct state.
In that case the _setup will exit without trying to reset
using sysconfig.
For the moment a warning is printed. A proper management of fclk
and module reset will have to be done in order to init correctly
the problematic IPs listed below.
<4>omap_hwmod: ivahd: cannot be enabled (3)
<4>omap_hwmod: iss: cannot be enabled (3)
<4>omap_hwmod: tesla: cannot be enabled (3)
<4>omap_hwmod: sdma: cannot be enabled (3)
<4>omap_hwmod: sl2: cannot be enabled (3)
<4>omap_hwmod: sad2d: cannot be enabled (3)
<4>omap_hwmod: ducati: cannot be enabled (3)
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
|
|
The maximum timeout to wait for the PRCM to request that a module
exit idle or reach functionnal state is common to OMAP2/3/4 SoCs,
so, move it to the chip family-common cm.h include file.
Reduce the timeout from 20 ms to 2 ms.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
|
|
Looks like these patches were not tested that well..
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
After a hardware module's clocks are enabled, Linux must wait for it
to indicate readiness via its IDLEST bit before attempting to access
the device, otherwise register accesses to the device may trigger an
abort. This has traditionally been implemented in the clock
framework, but this is the wrong place for it: the clock framework
doesn't know which module clocks must be enabled for a module to leave
idle; and if a module is not in smart-idle mode, it may never leave
idle at all. This type of information is best stored in a
per-hardware module data structure (coming in a following patch),
rather than a per-clock data structure. The new code will use these new
functions to handle waiting for modules to enable.
Once hardware module data is filled in for all of the on-chip devices,
the clock framework code to handle IDLEST waiting can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
|
