Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Move the call to cpu_suspend into C code, and noticing that all the
s3c_cpu_save implementations are now identical, we can move this
into the common samsung code.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
s3c_cpu_save does not need to save any registers with the new
cpu_suspend calling convention. Remove these redundant instructions.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
cpu_suspend() has a weird calling method which makes it only possible to
call from assembly code: it returns with a modified stack pointer to
finish the suspend, but on resume, it 'returns' via a provided pointer.
We can make cpu_suspend() appear to be a normal function merely by
swapping the resume pointer argument and the link register.
Do so, and update all callers to take account of this more traditional
behaviour.
Acked-by: Frank Hofmann <frank.hofmann@tomtom.com>
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Acked-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Tested-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
This patch adds suspend-to-ram support for S5PV210.
Note. This patch is confirmed on SMDKV210 and SMDKC110 board.
Signed-off-by: Jongpill Lee <boyko.lee@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
|