| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1459801503-15600-4-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1459801503-15600-2-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1459266123-21878-8-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
There are two concepts that have some confusing naming:
1. Extended State Component numbers (currently called
XFEATURE_BIT_*)
2. Extended State Component masks (currently called XSTATE_*)
The numbers are (currently) from 0-9. State component 3 is the
bounds registers for MPX, for instance.
But when we want to enable "state component 3", we go set a bit
in XCR0. The bit we set is 1<<3. We can check to see if a
state component feature is enabled by looking at its bit.
The current 'xfeature_bit's are at best xfeature bit _numbers_.
Calling them bits is at best inconsistent with ending the enum
list with 'XFEATURES_NR_MAX'.
This patch renames the enum to be 'xfeature'. These also
happen to be what the Intel documentation calls a "state
component".
We also want to differentiate these from the "XSTATE_*" macros.
The "XSTATE_*" macros are a mask, and we rename them to match.
These macros are reasonably widely used so this patch is a
wee bit big, but this really is just a rename.
The only non-mechanical part of this is the
s/XSTATE_EXTEND_MASK/XFEATURE_MASK_EXTEND/
We need a better name for it, but that's another patch.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: dave@sr71.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150902233126.38653250@viggo.jf.intel.com
[ Ported to v4.3-rc1. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Extends the x86_64 Poly1305 authenticator by a function processing four
consecutive Poly1305 blocks in parallel using AVX2 instructions.
For large messages, throughput increases by ~15-45% compared to two
block SSE2:
testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 3809514 opers/sec, 365713411 bytes/sec
test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 5973423 opers/sec, 573448627 bytes/sec
test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9446779 opers/sec, 906890803 bytes/sec
test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1364814 opers/sec, 393066691 bytes/sec
test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2045780 opers/sec, 589184697 bytes/sec
test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3711946 opers/sec, 1069040592 bytes/sec
test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 573686 opers/sec, 605812732 bytes/sec
test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1647802 opers/sec, 1740079440 bytes/sec
test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 292970 opers/sec, 609378224 bytes/sec
test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 943229 opers/sec, 1961916528 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 494623 opers/sec, 2041804569 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 254045 opers/sec, 2089271014 bytes/sec
testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 3826224 opers/sec, 367317552 bytes/sec
test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 5948638 opers/sec, 571069267 bytes/sec
test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9439110 opers/sec, 906154627 bytes/sec
test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1367756 opers/sec, 393913872 bytes/sec
test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2056881 opers/sec, 592381958 bytes/sec
test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3711153 opers/sec, 1068812179 bytes/sec
test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 574940 opers/sec, 607136745 bytes/sec
test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1948830 opers/sec, 2057964585 bytes/sec
test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 293308 opers/sec, 610082096 bytes/sec
test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1235224 opers/sec, 2569267792 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 684405 opers/sec, 2825226316 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 367101 opers/sec, 3019039446 bytes/sec
Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.
Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Extends the x86_64 SSE2 Poly1305 authenticator by a function processing two
consecutive Poly1305 blocks in parallel using a derived key r^2. Loop
unrolling can be more effectively mapped to SSE instructions, further
increasing throughput.
For large messages, throughput increases by ~45-65% compared to single
block SSE2:
testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 3790063 opers/sec, 363846076 bytes/sec
test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 5913378 opers/sec, 567684355 bytes/sec
test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9352574 opers/sec, 897847104 bytes/sec
test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1362145 opers/sec, 392297990 bytes/sec
test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2007075 opers/sec, 578037628 bytes/sec
test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3709811 opers/sec, 1068425798 bytes/sec
test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 566272 opers/sec, 597984182 bytes/sec
test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1111657 opers/sec, 1173910108 bytes/sec
test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 288857 opers/sec, 600823808 bytes/sec
test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 590746 opers/sec, 1228751888 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 301825 opers/sec, 1245936902 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 153075 opers/sec, 1258896201 bytes/sec
testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 3809514 opers/sec, 365713411 bytes/sec
test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 5973423 opers/sec, 573448627 bytes/sec
test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9446779 opers/sec, 906890803 bytes/sec
test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1364814 opers/sec, 393066691 bytes/sec
test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2045780 opers/sec, 589184697 bytes/sec
test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3711946 opers/sec, 1069040592 bytes/sec
test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 573686 opers/sec, 605812732 bytes/sec
test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1647802 opers/sec, 1740079440 bytes/sec
test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 292970 opers/sec, 609378224 bytes/sec
test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 943229 opers/sec, 1961916528 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 494623 opers/sec, 2041804569 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 254045 opers/sec, 2089271014 bytes/sec
Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.
Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Implements an x86_64 assembler driver for the Poly1305 authenticator. This
single block variant holds the 130-bit integer in 5 32-bit words, but uses
SSE to do two multiplications/additions in parallel.
When calling updates with small blocks, the overhead for kernel_fpu_begin/
kernel_fpu_end() negates the perfmance gain. We therefore use the
poly1305-generic fallback for small updates.
For large messages, throughput increases by ~5-10% compared to
poly1305-generic:
testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-generic)
test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 4080026 opers/sec, 391682496 bytes/sec
test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 6221094 opers/sec, 597225024 bytes/sec
test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9609750 opers/sec, 922536057 bytes/sec
test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1459379 opers/sec, 420301267 bytes/sec
test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2115179 opers/sec, 609171609 bytes/sec
test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3729874 opers/sec, 1074203856 bytes/sec
test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 593000 opers/sec, 626208000 bytes/sec
test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1081536 opers/sec, 1142102332 bytes/sec
test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 302077 opers/sec, 628320576 bytes/sec
test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 554384 opers/sec, 1153120176 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 278715 opers/sec, 1150536345 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 140202 opers/sec, 1153022070 bytes/sec
testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 3790063 opers/sec, 363846076 bytes/sec
test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 5913378 opers/sec, 567684355 bytes/sec
test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9352574 opers/sec, 897847104 bytes/sec
test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1362145 opers/sec, 392297990 bytes/sec
test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2007075 opers/sec, 578037628 bytes/sec
test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3709811 opers/sec, 1068425798 bytes/sec
test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 566272 opers/sec, 597984182 bytes/sec
test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1111657 opers/sec, 1173910108 bytes/sec
test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 288857 opers/sec, 600823808 bytes/sec
test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 590746 opers/sec, 1228751888 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 301825 opers/sec, 1245936902 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 153075 opers/sec, 1258896201 bytes/sec
Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.
Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
