summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2015-05-18x86/microcode/intel: Rename get_matching_sig()Borislav Petkov
... to find_matching_signature() which is exactly what it does. No functionality change. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431860101-14847-5-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-05-18x86/microcode/intel: Simplify update_match_cpu()Borislav Petkov
Drop unreadable macro, deconstruct compound conditional statement into single ones and return early if they match. Add comments. There should be no functionality change resulting from this patch. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431860101-14847-3-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-05-18x86/microcode/intel: Rename get_matching_microcodeBorislav Petkov
... to has_newer_microcode() as it does exactly that: checks whether binary data @mc has newer microcode patch than the applied one. Move @mc to be the first function arg too. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431860101-14847-2-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-05-06x86/microcode/intel: Remove unused @rev arg of get_matching_sig()Borislav Petkov
@rev wasn't used in get_matching_sig(), drop it. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-05-06x86/microcode/intel: Get rid of revision_is_newer()Borislav Petkov
It is a one-liner for checking microcode header revisions. On top of that, it can be used wrong as it was the case in _save_mc(). Get rid of it. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-03-02x86/microcode/intel: Move mc arg last in get_matching_{microcode|sig}Borislav Petkov
... arguments list so that it comes more natural for those functions to have the signature, processor flags and revision together, before the rest of the args. No functionality change. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2015-03-02x86/microcode/intel: Rename update_match_revision()Borislav Petkov
... to revision_is_newer() and push it up into the header and make it an inline function. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2014-12-06x86, microcode: Reload microcode on resumeBorislav Petkov
Normally, we do reapply microcode on resume. However, in the cases where that microcode comes from the early loader and the late loader hasn't been utilized yet, there's no easy way for us to go and apply the patch applied during boot by the early loader. Thus, reuse the patch stashed by the early loader for the BSP. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2014-07-28x86, microcode, intel: Fix total_size computationHenrique de Moraes Holschuh
According to the Intel SDM vol 3A (order code 253668-051US, June 2014), on section 9.11.1, page 9-28: "For microcode updates with a data size field equal to 00000000H, the size of the microcode update is 2048 bytes. The first 48 bytes contain the microcode update header. The remaining 2000 bytes contain encrypted data." "For microcode updates with a data size not equal to 00000000H, the total size field specifies the size of the microcode update." Up to 2002/2003, Intel used an "old format" for the microcode update containers that was always 2048 bytes in size. That old format did not have Data Size and Total Size fields, the quadwords at those positions in the microcode container header were "reserved". The microcode header of the "old format" microcode container has a hrdver of 0x01. You can hunt down an old copy of the Intel SDM to validate this through its order number (#243192). I found one from 1999 through a Google search. Sometime in 2002/2003 (AFAICT, for the Prescott processors), Intel documented a new format for the microcode containers and contributed in 2003 some code to the Linux kernel microcode driver implementing support for the new format. This new format has Data Size and Total Size fields, as well as the optional extended signature table. However, it reuses the same hrdver as the old format (0x01), and it can only be told apart from the old format by a non-zero Data Size field. In fact, the only reason we can even trust a Data Size of zero to mean that the microcode container is in the old format, is because Intel reatroatively promised that the old format would always have a zero there when they wrote the documentation for the _new_ format. This is a very old bug, dating back to 2003. It has been dormant ever since, as Intel seems to set all reserved fields to zero on the microcode updates they distribute: I could not find a public microcode update that would trigger this bug. Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1406146251-8540-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2013-07-14x86: delete __cpuinit usage from all x86 filesPaul Gortmaker
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the arch/x86 uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. x86 only had the one __CPUINIT used in assembly files, and it wasn't paired off with a .previous or a __FINIT, so we can delete it directly w/o any corresponding additional change there. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: x86@kernel.org Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-05-31x86, microcode: Vendor abstract out save_microcode_in_initrd()Jacob Shin
Currently save_microcode_in_initrd() is declared in vendor neutural microcode.h file, but defined in vendor specific microcode_intel_early.c file. Vendor abstract it out to microcode_core_early.c with a wrapper function. Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1369940959-2077-3-git-send-email-jacob.shin@amd.com Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
2013-01-31x86/microcode_intel.h: Define functions and macros for early loading ucodeFenghua Yu
Define some functions and macros that will be used in early loading ucode. Some of them are moved from microcode_intel.c driver in order to be called in early boot phase before module can be called. Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1356075872-3054-3-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>