| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The irq_domain_ops are not modified by the driver and the irqdomain core
code accepts pointer to a const data.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski.k@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430139264-4362-2-git-send-email-k.kozlowski.k@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
Use the new handle_domain_irq method to handle interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1409047421-27649-14-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
|
|
Now that we only ack irq 0 the code can be simplified a lot.
Also switch from read / modify / write to a simple write clear:
1) This is what the android code does (it has a hack for acking irq 0
in its unmask code doing this)
2) read / modify / write simply does not make sense for an irq status
register like this, if the other bits are writeable (and the data sheet says
they are not) they should be write 1 to clear, since otherwise a read /
modify / write can race with a device raising an interrupt and then clear
the pending bit unintentionally
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394895894-8891-3-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
Since the sun4i irq chip does not require any action and clears the interrupt
when the level goes back to inactive, we don't need to mask / unmask for
non oneshot IRQs, to achieve this we make sun4i_irq_ack a nop for all irqs
except irq 0 and use handle_fasteoi_irq for all interrupts.
Now there might be a case when the device reactivates the interrupt
before the RETI. But that does not matter as we run the primary
interrupt handlers with interrupts disabled.
This also allows us to get rid of needing to use 2 irq_chip structs, this
means that the IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED | IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED will now influence
all interrupts rather then just irq 0, but that does not matter as the eoi
is now a nop anyways for all interrupts but irq 0.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394895894-8891-2-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
All IRQs except for IRQ 0 seem to not need acking, so drop acking for them.
The ENMI needs to have the ack done *after* clearing the interrupt source,
otherwise we will get a spurious interrupt for each real interrupt.
So use the new IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED flag for this in combination with
handle_fasteoi_irq. This uses a separate irq_chip struct for IRQ 0,
since we only want this behavior for IRQ 0.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394733834-26839-5-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
The comment was claiming that we were masking all irqs, while the code actually
*un*masks all of them.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394733834-26839-4-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
SUN4I_IRQ_VECTOR_REG containing 0 can mean one of 3 things:
1) no more irqs pending
2) irq 0 pending
3) spurious irq
So if we immediately get a reading of 0, check the irq-pending reg
to differentiate between 2 and 3. We only do this once to avoid
the extra check in the common case of 1) hapening after having
read the vector-reg once.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394733834-26839-3-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
The Allwinner A10 compatibles were following a slightly different compatible
patterns than the rest of the SoCs for historical reasons. Change the compatibles
to match the other pattern in the irq controller driver for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
LTO patches add __visible to the asmlinkage define, causing
compilation warnings like:
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c:283:1: warning: 'externally_visible'
attribute have effect only on public objects [-Wattributes]
Drop asmlinkage here to avoid such warnings.
Reported-by: Olof's autobuilder <build@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: khilman@linaro.org
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1393980030-17770-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
sun4i_irq_ack() is only referenced in this file, so make it static.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1373010070.14756.2.camel@phoenix
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
During the introduction of the Allwinner SoC platforms, sunxi was
initially meant as a generic name for all the variants of the Allwinner
SoC.
It was ok at the time of the support of only the A10 and A13 that
looks pretty much the same, but it's beginning to be troublesome with
the future addition of the Allwinner A31 (sun6i) that is quite
different, and would introduce some weird logic, where sunxi would
actually mean in some case sun4i and sun5i but without sun6i...
Moreover, it makes the compatible strings naming scheme not consistent
with other architectures, where usually for this kind of compability, we
just use the oldest SoC name that has this IP, so let's do just this.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
|
