summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/reada.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-05-30Btrfs: fix race between readahead and device replace/removalFilipe Manana
The list of devices is protected by the device_list_mutex and the device replace code, in its finishing phase correctly takes that mutex before removing the source device from that list. However the readahead code was iterating that list without acquiring the respective mutex leading to crashes later on due to invalid memory accesses: [125671.831036] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [125671.832129] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_flakey dm_mod crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis tpm ppdev evdev parport_pc psmouse sg parport processor ser [125671.834973] CPU: 10 PID: 19603 Comm: kworker/u32:19 Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-29+ #1 [125671.834973] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [125671.834973] Workqueue: btrfs-readahead btrfs_readahead_helper [btrfs] [125671.834973] task: ffff8801ac520540 ti: ffff8801ac918000 task.ti: ffff8801ac918000 [125671.834973] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81270479>] [<ffffffff81270479>] __radix_tree_lookup+0x6a/0x105 [125671.834973] RSP: 0018:ffff8801ac91bc28 EFLAGS: 00010206 [125671.834973] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6a RCX: 0000000000000000 [125671.834973] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000c1bff RDI: ffff88002ebd62a8 [125671.834973] RBP: ffff8801ac91bc70 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [125671.834973] R10: ffff8801ac91bc70 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88002ebd62a8 [125671.834973] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000000000c1bff [125671.834973] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88023fd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [125671.834973] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [125671.834973] CR2: 000000000073cae4 CR3: 00000000b7723000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [125671.834973] Stack: [125671.834973] 0000000000000000 ffff8801422d5600 ffff8802286bbc00 0000000000000000 [125671.834973] 0000000000000001 ffff8802286bbc00 00000000000c1bff 0000000000000000 [125671.834973] ffff88002e639eb8 ffff8801ac91bc80 ffffffff81270541 ffff8801ac91bcb0 [125671.834973] Call Trace: [125671.834973] [<ffffffff81270541>] radix_tree_lookup+0xd/0xf [125671.834973] [<ffffffffa04ae6a6>] reada_peer_zones_set_lock+0x3e/0x60 [btrfs] [125671.834973] [<ffffffffa04ae8b9>] reada_pick_zone+0x29/0x103 [btrfs] [125671.834973] [<ffffffffa04af42f>] reada_start_machine_worker+0x129/0x2d3 [btrfs] [125671.834973] [<ffffffffa04880be>] btrfs_scrubparity_helper+0x185/0x3aa [btrfs] [125671.834973] [<ffffffffa0488341>] btrfs_readahead_helper+0xe/0x10 [btrfs] [125671.834973] [<ffffffff81069691>] process_one_work+0x271/0x4e9 [125671.834973] [<ffffffff81069dda>] worker_thread+0x1eb/0x2c9 [125671.834973] [<ffffffff81069bef>] ? rescuer_thread+0x2b3/0x2b3 [125671.834973] [<ffffffff8106f403>] kthread+0xd4/0xdc [125671.834973] [<ffffffff8149e242>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x40 [125671.834973] [<ffffffff8106f32f>] ? kthread_stop+0x286/0x286 So fix this by taking the device_list_mutex in the readahead code. We can't use here the lighter approach of using a rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() pair together with a list_for_each_entry_rcu() call because we end up doing calls to sleeping functions (kzalloc()) in the respective code path. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2016-04-04mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macrosKirill A. Shutemov
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-02-26Merge branch 'foreign/liubo/replace-lockup' into for-chris-4.6David Sterba
2016-02-26Merge branch 'foreign/zhaolei/reada' into for-chris-4.6David Sterba
2016-02-23Btrfs: fix lockdep deadlock warning due to dev_replaceLiu Bo
Xfstests btrfs/011 complains about a deadlock warning, [ 1226.649039] ========================================================= [ 1226.649039] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ] [ 1226.649039] 4.1.0+ #270 Not tainted [ 1226.649039] --------------------------------------------------------- [ 1226.652955] kswapd0/46 just changed the state of lock: [ 1226.652955] (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0 [ 1226.652955] but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past: [ 1226.652955] (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock){+.+.+.} and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. [ 1226.652955] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1226.652955] Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> &found->groups_sem --> &fs_info->dev_replace.lock [ 1226.652955] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: [ 1226.652955] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1226.652955] ---- ---- [ 1226.652955] lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock); [ 1226.652955] local_irq_disable(); [ 1226.652955] lock(&delayed_node->mutex); [ 1226.652955] lock(&found->groups_sem); [ 1226.652955] <Interrupt> [ 1226.652955] lock(&delayed_node->mutex); [ 1226.652955] *** DEADLOCK *** Commit 084b6e7c7607 ("btrfs: Fix a lockdep warning when running xfstest.") tried to fix a similar one that has the exactly same warning, but with that, we still run to this. The above lock chain comes from btrfs_commit_transaction ->btrfs_run_delayed_items ... ->__btrfs_update_delayed_inode ... ->__btrfs_cow_block ... ->find_free_extent ->cache_block_group ->load_free_space_cache ->btrfs_readpages ->submit_one_bio ... ->__btrfs_map_block ->btrfs_dev_replace_lock However, with high memory pressure, tasks which hold dev_replace.lock can be interrupted by kswapd and then kswapd is intended to release memory occupied by superblock, inodes and dentries, where we may call evict_inode, and it comes to [ 1226.652955] [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0 [ 1226.652955] [<ffffffff81459e74>] btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x24/0x30 [ 1226.652955] [<ffffffff8140c5fe>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x34e/0x700 delayed_node->mutex may be acquired in __btrfs_release_delayed_node(), and it leads to a ABBA deadlock. To fix this, we can use "blocking rwlock" used in the case of extent_buffer, but things are simpler here since we only needs read's spinlock to blocking lock. With this, btrfs/011 no more produces warnings in dmesg. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-02-18btrfs: reada: ignore creating reada_extent for a non-existent deviceZhao Lei
For a non-existent device, old code bypasses adding it in dev's reada queue. And to solve problem of unfinished waitting in raid5/6, commit 5fbc7c59fd22 ("Btrfs: fix unfinished readahead thread for raid5/6 degraded mounting") adding an exception for the first stripe, in short, the first stripe will always be processed whether the device exists or not. Actually we have a better way for the above request: just bypass creation of the reada_extent for non-existent device, it will make code simple and effective. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-02-18btrfs: reada: avoid undone reada extents in btrfs_reada_waitZhao Lei
Reada background works is not designed to finish all jobs completely, it will break in following case: 1: When a device reaches workload limit (MAX_IN_FLIGHT) 2: Total reads reach max limit (10000) 3: All devices don't have queued more jobs, often happened in DUP case And if all background works exit with remaining jobs, btrfs_reada_wait() will wait indefinetelly. Above problem is rarely happened in old code, because: 1: Every work queues 2x new works So many works reduced chances of undone jobs. 2: One work will continue 10000 times loop in case of no-jobs It reduced no-thread window time. But after we fixed above case, the "undone reada extents" frequently happened. Fix: Check to ensure we have at least one thread if there are undone jobs in btrfs_reada_wait(). Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-02-18btrfs: reada: limit max works countZhao Lei
Reada creates 2 works for each level of tree recursively. In case of a tree having many levels, the number of created works is 2^level_of_tree. Actually we don't need so many works in parallel, this patch limits max works to BTRFS_MAX_MIRRORS * 2. The per-fs works_counter will be also used for btrfs_reada_wait() to check is there are background workers. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-02-18btrfs: reada: simplify dev->reada_in_flight processingZhao Lei
No need to decrease dev->reada_in_flight in __readahead_hook()'s internal and reada_extent_put(). reada_extent_put() have no chance to decrease dev->reada_in_flight in free operation, because reada_extent have additional refcnt when scheduled to a dev. We can put inc and dec operation for dev->reada_in_flight to one place instead to make logic simple and safe, and move useless reada_extent->scheduled_for to a bool flag instead. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-02-18btrfs: reada: Fix a debug code typoZhao Lei
Remove one copy of loop to fix the typo of iterate zones. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-02-18btrfs: reada: Jump into cleanup in direct way for __readahead_hook()Zhao Lei
Current code set nritems to 0 to make for_loop useless to bypass it, and set generation's value which is not necessary. Jump into cleanup directly is better choise. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-02-18btrfs: reada: Use fs_info instead of root in __readahead_hook's argumentZhao Lei
What __readahead_hook() need exactly is fs_info, no need to convert fs_info to root in caller and convert back in __readahead_hook() Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-02-18btrfs: reada: Pass reada_extent into __readahead_hook directlyZhao Lei
reada_start_machine_dev() already have reada_extent pointer, pass it into __readahead_hook() directly instead of search radix_tree will make code run faster. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-02-18btrfs: reada: move reada_extent_put to place after __readahead_hook()Zhao Lei
We can't release reada_extent earlier than __readahead_hook(), because __readahead_hook() still need to use it, it is necessary to hode a refcnt to avoid it be freed. Actually it is not a problem after my patch named: Avoid many times of empty loop It make reada_extent in above line include at least one reada_extctl, which keeps additional one refcnt for reada_extent. But we still need this patch to make the code in pretty logic. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-02-18btrfs: reada: Remove level argument in severial functionsZhao Lei
level is not used in severial functions, remove them from arguments, and remove relative code for get its value. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-02-18btrfs: reada: bypass adding extent when all zone failedZhao Lei
When failed adding all dev_zones for a reada_extent, the extent will have no chance to be selected to run, and keep in memory for ever. We should bypass this extent to avoid above case. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-02-18btrfs: reada: add all reachable mirrors into reada device listZhao Lei
If some device is not reachable, we should bypass and continus addingb next, instead of break on bad device. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-02-18btrfs: reada: Move is_need_to_readahead contition earlierZhao Lei
Move is_need_to_readahead contition earlier to avoid useless loop to get relative data for readahead. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-02-16btrfs: reada: Avoid many times of empty loopZhao Lei
We can see following loop(10000 times) in trace_log: [ 75.416137] ZL_DEBUG: reada_start_machine_dev:730: pid=771 comm=kworker/u2:3 re->ref_cnt ffff88003741e0c0 1 -> 2 [ 75.417413] ZL_DEBUG: reada_extent_put:524: pid=771 comm=kworker/u2:3 re = ffff88003741e0c0, refcnt = 2 -> 1 [ 75.418611] ZL_DEBUG: __readahead_hook:129: pid=771 comm=kworker/u2:3 re->ref_cnt ffff88003741e0c0 1 -> 2 [ 75.419793] ZL_DEBUG: reada_extent_put:524: pid=771 comm=kworker/u2:3 re = ffff88003741e0c0, refcnt = 2 -> 1 [ 75.421016] ZL_DEBUG: reada_start_machine_dev:730: pid=771 comm=kworker/u2:3 re->ref_cnt ffff88003741e0c0 1 -> 2 [ 75.422324] ZL_DEBUG: reada_extent_put:524: pid=771 comm=kworker/u2:3 re = ffff88003741e0c0, refcnt = 2 -> 1 [ 75.423661] ZL_DEBUG: __readahead_hook:129: pid=771 comm=kworker/u2:3 re->ref_cnt ffff88003741e0c0 1 -> 2 [ 75.424882] ZL_DEBUG: reada_extent_put:524: pid=771 comm=kworker/u2:3 re = ffff88003741e0c0, refcnt = 2 -> 1 ...(10000 times) [ 124.101672] ZL_DEBUG: reada_start_machine_dev:730: pid=771 comm=kworker/u2:3 re->ref_cnt ffff88003741e0c0 1 -> 2 [ 124.102850] ZL_DEBUG: reada_extent_put:524: pid=771 comm=kworker/u2:3 re = ffff88003741e0c0, refcnt = 2 -> 1 [ 124.104008] ZL_DEBUG: __readahead_hook:129: pid=771 comm=kworker/u2:3 re->ref_cnt ffff88003741e0c0 1 -> 2 [ 124.105121] ZL_DEBUG: reada_extent_put:524: pid=771 comm=kworker/u2:3 re = ffff88003741e0c0, refcnt = 2 -> 1 Reason: If more than one user trigger reada in same extent, the first task finished setting of reada data struct and call reada_start_machine() to start, and the second task only add a ref_count but have not add reada_extctl struct completely, the reada_extent can not finished all jobs, and will be selected in __reada_start_machine() for 10000 times(total times in __reada_start_machine()). Fix: For a reada_extent without job, we don't need to run it, just return 0 to let caller break. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-02-16btrfs: reada: Add missed segment checking in reada_find_zoneZhao Lei
In rechecking zone-in-tree, we still need to check zone include our logical address. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-02-16btrfs: reada: reduce additional fs_info->reada_lock in reada_find_zoneZhao Lei
We can avoid additional locking-acquirment and one pair of kref_get/put by combine two condition. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-02-16btrfs: reada: Fix in-segment calculation for readaZhao Lei
reada_zone->end is end pos of segment: end = start + cache->key.offset - 1; So we need to use "<=" in condition to judge is a pos in the segment. The problem happened rearly, because logical pos rarely pointed to last 4k of a blockgroup, but we need to fix it to make code right in logic. Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2016-02-11btrfs: reada: use GFP_KERNEL everywhereDavid Sterba
The readahead framework is not on the critical writeback path we don't need to use GFP_NOFS for allocations. All error paths are handled and the readahead failures are not fatal. The actual users (scrub, dev-replace) will trigger reads if the blocks are not found in cache. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-10-21btrfs: reada: Fix returned errno codeLuis de Bethencourt
reada is using -1 instead of the -ENOMEM defined macro to specify that a buffer allocation failed. Since the error number is propagated, the caller will get a -EPERM which is the wrong error condition. Also, updating the caller to return the exact value from reada_add_block. Smatch tool warning: reada_add_block() warn: returning -1 instead of -ENOMEM is sloppy Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-08-09Btrfs: count devices correctly in readahead during RAID 5/6 replaceOmar Sandoval
Commit 5fbc7c59fd22 ("Btrfs: fix unfinished readahead thread for raid5/6 degraded mounting") fixed a problem where we would skip a missing device when we shouldn't have because there are no other mirrors to read from in RAID 5/6. After commit 2c8cdd6ee4e7 ("Btrfs, replace: write dirty pages into the replace target device"), the fix doesn't work when we're doing a missing device replace on RAID 5/6 because the replace device is counted as a mirror so we're tricked into thinking we can safely skip the missing device. The fix is to count only the real stripes and decide based on that. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-01-22Btrfs: add ref_count and free function for btrfs_bioZhao Lei
1: ref_count is simple than current RBIO_HOLD_BBIO_MAP_BIT flag to keep btrfs_bio's memory in raid56 recovery implement. 2: free function for bbio will make code clean and flexible, plus forced data type checking in compile. Changelog v1->v2: Rename following by David Sterba's suggestion: put_btrfs_bio() -> btrfs_put_bio() get_btrfs_bio() -> btrfs_get_bio() bbio->ref_count -> bbio->refs Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-12-12btrfs: sink blocksize parameter to reada_tree_block_flaggedDavid Sterba
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-12-12btrfs: remove blocksize from reada_extentDavid Sterba
Replace with global nodesize instead. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-09-17btrfs: use nodesize everywhere, kill leafsizeDavid Sterba
The nodesize and leafsize were never of different values. Unify the usage and make nodesize the one. Cleanup the redundant checks and helpers. Shaves a few bytes from .text: text data bss dec hex filename 852418 24560 23112 900090 dbbfa btrfs.ko.before 851074 24584 23112 898770 db6d2 btrfs.ko.after Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-08-24Btrfs: fix task hang under heavy compressed writeLiu Bo
This has been reported and discussed for a long time, and this hang occurs in both 3.15 and 3.16. Btrfs now migrates to use kernel workqueue, but it introduces this hang problem. Btrfs has a kind of work queued as an ordered way, which means that its ordered_func() must be processed in the way of FIFO, so it usually looks like -- normal_work_helper(arg) work = container_of(arg, struct btrfs_work, normal_work); work->func() <---- (we name it work X) for ordered_work in wq->ordered_list ordered_work->ordered_func() ordered_work->ordered_free() The hang is a rare case, first when we find free space, we get an uncached block group, then we go to read its free space cache inode for free space information, so it will file a readahead request btrfs_readpages() for page that is not in page cache __do_readpage() submit_extent_page() btrfs_submit_bio_hook() btrfs_bio_wq_end_io() submit_bio() end_workqueue_bio() <--(ret by the 1st endio) queue a work(named work Y) for the 2nd also the real endio() So the hang occurs when work Y's work_struct and work X's work_struct happens to share the same address. A bit more explanation, A,B,C -- struct btrfs_work arg -- struct work_struct kthread: worker_thread() pick up a work_struct from @worklist process_one_work(arg) worker->current_work = arg; <-- arg is A->normal_work worker->current_func(arg) normal_work_helper(arg) A = container_of(arg, struct btrfs_work, normal_work); A->func() A->ordered_func() A->ordered_free() <-- A gets freed B->ordered_func() submit_compressed_extents() find_free_extent() load_free_space_inode() ... <-- (the above readhead stack) end_workqueue_bio() btrfs_queue_work(work C) B->ordered_free() As if work A has a high priority in wq->ordered_list and there are more ordered works queued after it, such as B->ordered_func(), its memory could have been freed before normal_work_helper() returns, which means that kernel workqueue code worker_thread() still has worker->current_work pointer to be work A->normal_work's, ie. arg's address. Meanwhile, work C is allocated after work A is freed, work C->normal_work and work A->normal_work are likely to share the same address(I confirmed this with ftrace output, so I'm not just guessing, it's rare though). When another kthread picks up work C->normal_work to process, and finds our kthread is processing it(see find_worker_executing_work()), it'll think work C as a collision and skip then, which ends up nobody processing work C. So the situation is that our kthread is waiting forever on work C. Besides, there're other cases that can lead to deadlock, but the real problem is that all btrfs workqueue shares one work->func, -- normal_work_helper, so this makes each workqueue to have its own helper function, but only a wraper pf normal_work_helper. With this patch, I no long hit the above hang. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-13Btrfs: fix unfinished readahead thread for raid5/6 degraded mountingWang Shilong
Steps to reproduce: # mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sd[b-f] -m raid5 -d raid5 # mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdc --->corrupt one of btrfs device # mount /dev/sdb /mnt -o degraded # btrfs scrub start -BRd /mnt This is because readahead would skip missing device, this is not true for RAID5/6, because REQ_GET_READ_MIRRORS return 1 for RAID5/6 block mapping. If expected data locates in missing device, readahead thread would not call __readahead_hook() which makes event @rc->elems=0 wait forever. Fix this problem by checking return value of btrfs_map_block(),we can only skip missing device safely if there are several mirrors. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-10btrfs: Cleanup the "_struct" suffix in btrfs_workequeueQu Wenruo
Since the "_struct" suffix is mainly used for distinguish the differnt btrfs_work between the original and the newly created one, there is no need using the suffix since all btrfs_workers are changed into btrfs_workqueue. Also this patch fixed some codes whose code style is changed due to the too long "_struct" suffix. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10btrfs: Replace fs_info->readahead_workers workqueue with btrfs_workqueue.Qu Wenruo
Replace the fs_info->readahead_workers with the newly created btrfs_workqueue. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-01-28Btrfs: convert printk to btrfs_ and fix BTRFS prefixFrank Holton
Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros. Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix. Signed-off-by: Frank Holton <fholton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2013-05-06Btrfs: fix reada debug code compilationVincent
This fixes the following errors: fs/btrfs/reada.c: In function ‘btrfs_reada_wait’: fs/btrfs/reada.c:958:42: error: invalid operands to binary < (have ‘atomic_t’ and ‘int’) fs/btrfs/reada.c:961:41: error: invalid operands to binary < (have ‘atomic_t’ and ‘int’) Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@laposte.net> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: introduce GET_READ_MIRRORS functionality for btrfs_map_block()Stefan Behrens
Before this commit, btrfs_map_block() was called with REQ_WRITE in order to retrieve the list of mirrors for a disk block. This needs to be changed for the device replace procedure since it makes a difference whether you are asking for read mirrors or for locations to write to. GET_READ_MIRRORS is introduced as a new interface to call btrfs_map_block(). In the current commit, the functionality is not yet changed, only the interface for GET_READ_MIRRORS is introduced and all the places that should use this new interface are adapted. The reason that REQ_WRITE cannot be abused anymore to retrieve a list of read mirrors is that during a running dev replace operation all write requests to the live filesystem are duplicated to also write to the target drive. Keep in mind that the target disk is only partially a valid copy of the source disk while the operation is ongoing. All writes go to the target disk, but not all reads would return valid data on the target disk. Therefore it is not possible anymore to abuse a REQ_WRITE interface to find valid mirrors for a REQ_READ. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: change core code of btrfs to support the device replace operationsStefan Behrens
This commit contains all the essential changes to the core code of Btrfs for support of the device replace procedure. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: add code to scrub to copy read data to another diskStefan Behrens
The device replace procedure makes use of the scrub code. The scrub code is the most efficient code to read the allocated data of a disk, i.e. it reads sequentially in order to avoid disk head movements, it skips unallocated blocks, it uses read ahead mechanisms, and it contains all the code to detect and repair defects. This commit adds code to scrub to allow the scrub code to copy read data to another disk. One goal is to be able to perform as fast as possible. Therefore the write requests are collected until huge bios are built, and the write process is decoupled from the read process with some kind of flow control, of course, in order to limit the allocated memory. The best performance on spinning disks could by reached when the head movements are avoided as much as possible. Therefore a single worker is used to interface the read process with the write process. The regular scrub operation works as fast as before, it is not negatively influenced and actually it is more or less unchanged. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-12-12Btrfs: pass fs_info to btrfs_map_block() instead of mapping_treeStefan Behrens
This is required for the device replace procedure in a later step. Two calling functions also had to be changed to have the fs_info pointer: repair_io_failure() and scrub_setup_recheck_block(). Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2012-10-03btrfs: reada_extent doesn't need kref for refcountAl Viro
All increments and decrements are under the same spinlock - have to be, since they need to protect the radix_tree it's found in. Just use int, no need to wank with kref... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-05-30Btrfs: set ioprio of scrub readahead to idleStefan Behrens
Reduce ioprio class of scrub readahead threads to idle priority. This setting is fixed. This priority has shown the best performance during all measurements. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
2012-04-18btrfs: don't add both copies of DUP to reada extent treeArne Jansen
Normally when there are 2 copies of a block, we add both to the reada extent tree and prefetch only the one that is easier to reach. This way we can better utilize multiple devices. In case of DUP this makes no sense as both copies reside on the same device. Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
2012-04-18btrfs: fix race in readaArne Jansen
When inserting into the radix tree returns EEXIST, get the existing entry without giving up the spinlock in between. There was a race for both the zones trees and the extent tree. Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
2012-03-27Btrfs: introduce common define for max number of mirrorsStefan Behrens
Readahead already has a define for the max number of mirrors. Scrub needs such a define now, the rest of the code will need something like this soon. Therefore the define was added to ctree.h and removed from the readahead code. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2012-03-03Btrfs: fix casting error in scrub reada codeChris Mason
The reada code from scrub was casting down a u64 to an unsigned long so it could insert it into a radix tree. What it really wanted to do was cast down the result of a shift, instead of casting down the u64. The bug resulted in trying to insert our reada struct into the wrong place, which caused soft lockups and other problems. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-06Btrfs: rename btrfs_bio multi -> bbio for consistencyIlya Dryomov
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-06Btrfs: stop leaking btrfs_bios on readaheadIlya Dryomov
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-06Merge git://git.jan-o-sch.net/btrfs-unstable into integrationChris Mason
Conflicts: fs/btrfs/Makefile fs/btrfs/extent_io.c fs/btrfs/extent_io.h fs/btrfs/scrub.c Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-10-02btrfs: initial readahead code and prototypesArne Jansen
This is the implementation for the generic read ahead framework. To trigger a readahead, btrfs_reada_add must be called. It will start a read ahead for the given range [start, end) on tree root. The returned handle can either be used to wait on the readahead to finish (btrfs_reada_wait), or to send it to the background (btrfs_reada_detach). The read ahead works as follows: On btrfs_reada_add, the root of the tree is inserted into a radix_tree. reada_start_machine will then search for extents to prefetch and trigger some reads. When a read finishes for a node, all contained node/leaf pointers that lie in the given range will also be enqueued. The reads will be triggered in sequential order, thus giving a big win over a naive enumeration. It will also make use of multi-device layouts. Each disk will have its on read pointer and all disks will by utilized in parallel. Also will no two disks read both sides of a mirror simultaneously, as this would waste seeking capacity. Instead both disks will read different parts of the filesystem. Any number of readaheads can be started in parallel. The read order will be determined globally, i.e. 2 parallel readaheads will normally finish faster than the 2 started one after another. Changes v2: - protect root->node by transaction instead of node_lock - fix missed branches: The readahead had a too simple check to determine if a branch from a node should be checked or not. It now also records the upper bound of each node to see if the requested RA range lies within. - use KERN_CONT to debug output, to avoid line breaks - defer reada_start_machine to worker to avoid deadlock Changes v3: - protect root->node by rcu Changes v5: - changed EIO-semantics of reada_tree_block_flagged - remove spin_lock from reada_control and make elems an atomic_t - remove unused read_total from reada_control - kill reada_key_cmp, use btrfs_comp_cpu_keys instead - use kref-style release functions where possible - return struct reada_control * instead of void * from btrfs_reada_add Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>