diff options
author | Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@nxp.com> | 2016-07-14 16:27:52 (GMT) |
---|---|---|
committer | York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com> | 2016-07-21 18:09:34 (GMT) |
commit | aa36c84edfcfd8c7d0348511e7b0fbb43514cd35 (patch) | |
tree | 60a938b880f3b42c9077b65779a1c791dbd7d121 /board/isee/igep00x0 | |
parent | 8f01397ba76d1ee210bedbf031d807e8df34c482 (diff) | |
download | u-boot-aa36c84edfcfd8c7d0348511e7b0fbb43514cd35.tar.xz |
powerpc/mpc85xx: T104x: Add nand secure boot target
For mpc85xx SoCs, the core begins execution from address 0xFFFFFFFC.
In non-secure boot scenario from NAND, this address will map to CPC
configured as SRAM. But in case of secure boot, this default address
always maps to IBR (Internal Boot ROM).
The IBR code requires that the bootloader(U-boot) must lie in 0 to 3.5G
address space i.e. 0x0 - 0xDFFFFFFF.
For secure boot target from NAND, the text base for SPL is kept same as
non-secure boot target i.e. 0xFFFx_xxxx but the SPL U-boot binary will
be copied to CPC configured as SRAM with address in 0-3.5G(0xBFFC_0000)
As a the virtual and physical address of CPC would be different. The
virtual address 0xFFFx_xxxx needs to be mapped to physical address
0xBFFx_xxxx.
Create a new PBI file to configure CPC as SRAM with address 0xBFFC0000
and update DCFG SCRTACH1 register with location of Header required for
secure boot.
The changes are similar to
commit 467a40dfe35f48d830f01a72617207d03ca85b4d
powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- NAND secure boot target for P3041
While P3041 has a 1MB CPC and does not require SPL. On T104x, CPC
is only 256K and thus SPL framework is used.
The changes are only applicable for SPL U-Boot running out of CPC SRAM
and not the next level U-Boot loaded on DDR.
Reviewed-by: Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: York Sun <york.sun@nxp.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'board/isee/igep00x0')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions