| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Changed the following DDR timing parameters for 800Mt/s:
tRRT BL/2+1 to BL/2
tWWT BL/2+1 to BL/2
tWRT BL/2+1 to BL/2
tRWT BL/2+1 to BL/2
REFINT 6500ns to 7800ns
Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal <poonam.aggrwal@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
Using DDR as RAMBOOT base instead of L2SRAM for SDCard and SPI Flash
boot loaders because:
- P1_P2_RDB boards have soldered DDR so no need for SPD
- Also P102x has 256K L2 cache size so becomes a limiting factor for
size of image that could be loaded in SRAM mode and would require three
stage boot loader (TPL).
Changes done:
1. CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE to 0x11000000
2. CONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS to 0x1107fffc
Signed-off-by: Priyanka Jain <Priyanka.Jain@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal <Poonam.Aggrwal@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Dipen Dudhat <Dipen.Dudhat@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
Remove declerations of fsl_ddr_set_memctl_regs in board files with and
place it into a common header.
Based on patch from Poonam Aggrwal.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
Rather than having #defines DATARATE_*_MHZ, lets just match what we do on
the SPD code and convert the DDR frequency into MHZ and just compare
with a constant.
Based on patch from Poonam Aggrwal.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
Correct initdram to use phys_size_t to represent the size of
dram; instead of changing this all over the place, and correcting
all the other random errors I've noticed, create a
common initdram that is used by all non-corenet 85xx parts. Most
of the initdram() functions were identical, with 2 common differences:
1) DDR tlbs for the fixed_sdram case were set up in initdram() on
some boards, and were part of the tlb_table on others. I have
changed them all over to the initdram() method - we shouldn't
be accessing dram before this point so they don't need to be
done sooner, and this seems cleaner.
2) Parts that require the DDR11 erratum workaround had different
implementations - I have adopted the version from the Freescale
errata document. It also looks like some of the versions were
buggy, and, depending on timing, could have resulted in the
DDR controller being disabled. This seems bad.
The xpedite boards had a common/fsl_8xxx_ddr.c; with this
change only the 517 board uses this so I have moved the ddr code
into that board's directory in xpedite517x.c
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <beckyb@kernel.crashing.org>
Tested-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
Use a slighly larger value of CLK_CTRL for DDR at 667MHz
which fixes random crashes while linux booting.
Applicable for both NAND and NOR boot.
Signed-off-by: Sandeep Gopalpet <sandeep.kumar@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal <poonam.aggrwal@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal <poonam.aggrwal@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
The data being modified was in NOR flash which caused the crash.
Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal <poonam.aggrwal@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
The P1020/P1011 SOCs support max 32bit DDR width as opposed to P2020/P2010
where max DDR data width supported is 64bit.
As a next step the DDR data width initialization would be made more dynamic
with more flexibility from the board perspective and user choice.
Going forward we would also remove the hardcodings for platforms with onboard
memories and try to use the FSL SPD code for DDR initialization.
Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal <poonam.aggrwal@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
The ddr_pd_cntl isn't defined in any reference manual and thus we wil
remove especially since we set it to 0, which would most likely be its
POR value.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
The code base adds P1 & P2 RDB platforms support.
The folder and file names can cater to future SOCs of P1/P2 family.
P1 & P2 processors are 85xx platforms, part of Freescale QorIQ series.
Tested following on P2020RDB:
1. eTSECs
2. DDR, NAND, NOR, I2C.
Signed-off-by: Poonam Aggrwal <poonam.aggrwal@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
|
