| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The current implementation has ugly switch statements here and there,
and duplicates similar code. Rework it using table lookups for SoC
data and reduce code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
The spl_boot_mode() is unrelated to the other code in this file.
Besides, this function is only called from common/spl/spl_mmc.c,
so it is reasonable to guard with CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Currently, arch/arm/mach-uniphier/boot-mode/boot-mode.c is messed up
with unrelated code; there is no reason why the "mmcsetn" command
must be placed in this file.
Split out the MMC code into arch/arm/mach-uniphier/mmc-first-dev.c.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Currently, uniphier_get_soc_type() converts the SoC ID (this is
read from the revision register) to an enum symbol to use it for SoC
identification. Come to think of it, there is no need for the
conversion in the first place. Using the SoC ID from the register
as-is a straightforward way.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
These files only need error number macros. Actually, IS_ERR(),
PTR_ERR(), ERR_PTR(), etc. are not useful for U-Boot. Avoid
unnecessary header includes.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
The SPL code already knows which boot device it calls the spl_boot_mode()
on, so pass that information into the function. This allows the code of
spl_boot_mode() avoid invoking spl_boot_device() again, but it also lets
board_boot_order() correctly alter the behavior of the boot process.
The later one is important, since in certain cases, it is desired that
spl_boot_device() return value be overriden using board_boot_order().
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Andreas Bießmann <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>
Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas@biessmann.org>
[add newly introduced zynq variant]
Signed-aff-by: Andreas Bießmann <andreas@biessmann.org>
|
|
The Boot ROM on PH1-LD11/LD20 exports built-in APIs to load images
from an eMMC device. They are useful to reduce the memory footprint
of SPL, rather than compiling the whole MMC framework.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
This is a low-cost ARMv8 SoC from Socionext Inc.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Spelling corrections for (among other things):
* environment
* override
* variable
* ftd (should be "fdt", for flattened device tree)
* embedded
* FTDI
* emulation
* controller
|
|
This is the first ARMv8 SoC from Socionext Inc.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Eliminate the "ph1"_ prefixes from function names because "uniphier_"
describes the SoC familiy better.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
The current CONFIG names like "CONFIG_ARCH_UNIPHIER_PH1_PRO4" is too
long. It would not hurt to drop "PH1_" because "UNIPHIER_" already
well specifies the SoC family. Also, rename files for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Of the several boot devices supported, it looks like the eMMC is the
most commonly used. Enable CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC by default.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
UniPhier SoC family supports both (e)MMC boot and SD card boot;
however, both of them are handled in the same uclass.
When booting from the eMMC, we want to know the device number
of the (e)MMC, not SD. This command is useful to find the first
MMC (non-SD) device.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Export device nodes needed for eMMC boot (eMMC node, pinctrl, and
clock) to the SPL DTB. CONFIG_SUPPORT_EMMC_BOOT is also necessary
to use "mmc partconf" command.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
The USB boot code is too fat and complicated to be included in SPL
(at least for now). So, it was implemented as a separate project
(what we call USB-loader).
The expected boot sequence is as follows:
Boot ROM -> USB-loader -> SPL -> U-Boot proper
The USB-loader loads the SPL and U-Boot proper from a USB memory
onto the locked L2 cache. Then, SPL needs to copy the U-Boot proper
to DRAM, so this mode looks like a NOR boot from the view of SPL.
However, we want to distinguish between (genuine) NOR boot and USB
boot in some places.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
These headers are only included locally in arch/arm/mach-uniphier/.
There is no reason to export them by putting in the mach/ directory.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
These includes are not necessary.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
The DDR SDRAM initialization code has not been mainlined yet, but
U-Boot proper should work.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
The DDR SDRAM initialization code has not been mainlined yet, but
U-Boot proper should work.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Before this commit, the Kconfig menu in mach-uniphier only allowed us
to choose one SoC to be compiled. Each SoC has its own defconfig file
for the build-test coverage. Consequently, some defconfig files are
duplicated with only the difference in CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE and
CONFIG_{SOC_NAME}=y.
Now, most of board-specific parameters have been moved to device trees,
so it makes sense to include init code of multiple SoCs into a single
image as long as the SoCs have similar architecture. In fact, some
SoCs of UniPhier family are very similar:
- PH1-LD4 and PH1-sLD8
- PH1-LD6b and ProXstream2 (will be added in the upcoming commit)
This commit will be helpful to merge some defconfig files for better
maintainability.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
